Project

General

Profile

Feature #879

Specify the toolkit Audacious was built with

Added by Artem S. Tashkinov almost 6 years ago. Updated about 5 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Minor
Assignee:
-
Category:
plugins/qtui
Target version:
-
Start date:
March 09, 2019
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Affects version:

Description

Specify the toolkit Audacious was built with

Either in the title bar, e.g. Audacious Qt/GTK

or in the About Dialog along with its version.

History

#1 Updated by John Lindgren almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

I don't think this is worth implementing. All packaged versions should be using GTK2. If you're building from source, you should already know what toolkit you're using.

#2 Updated by Artem S. Tashkinov almost 6 years ago

John Lindgren wrote:

I don't think this is worth implementing. All packaged versions should be using GTK2. If you're building from source, you should already know what toolkit you're using.

It might be very useful for all the users who don't compile Audacious, i.e. distro users and Windows users.

For instance Debian builds Audacious with GTK2 ( https://packages.debian.org/sid/audacious-plugins ) while Fedora 29 uses Qt ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/audacious-plugins.git/tree/audacious-plugins.spec ).

#3 Updated by Artem S. Tashkinov over 5 years ago

John Lindgren wrote:

I don't think this is worth implementing. All packaged versions should be using GTK2. If you're building from source, you should already know what toolkit you're using.

It might be very useful for all the users who don't compile Audacious, i.e. distro users and Windows users.

For instance Debian builds Audacious with GTK2 ( https://packages.debian.org/sid/audacious-plugins ) while Fedora 29 uses Qt ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/audacious-plugins.git/tree/audacious-plugins.spec ).

#4 Updated by John Lindgren about 5 years ago

  • Target version deleted (4.0)

#5 Updated by Artem S. Tashkinov about 5 years ago

Target version deleted (4.0)

I'm confused: you rejected this feature request ages ago and now you're updating it, why? ;-)

Also available in: Atom PDF